|
Prioritise clarity |
A few
questions:
Shall
I explain the background to . . .?
Can I
describe the history of . . . ?
May I
describe how I collected my data?
Can I
describe the results of my survey?
Can I
illustrate the meaning of . . . ?
Answer:
Only
briefly please!
As a
student writing reports and essays you will often encounter the need to provide
background information or additional narrative at the outset. This means giving an account
of the events that relate to the question or the data you are presenting; it is necessary as long as context is retained. However it should always be
brief and not take over the essay. Less than 10% of the essay should be
something that could be referred to as a description or definition.
This
is not to say that providing background information is not valuable, in fact
providing brief, precise, targeted background information can set the scene, clarifying and
defining the context and direction of your essay; contributing positively to your
introduction. Unfortunately many of the essays that I read (at
all levels) have rather a tendency to be taken over by elaborate
descriptions of terms, or background information that wanders so far from the
question that the purpose of writing is obscured.
As a
former history undergraduate I often needed to provide background information
when writing essays – I also frequently had essays returned with their second
and third paragraphs scored out and the word ‘irrelevant’ scrawled next to what
had taken me several hours to research, so I understand the frustrations. As a proof
reader I find it relatively easy to judge what is answering the question and
what is irrelevant, so I have pondered what advice to give on the subject
carefully.
I
personally found when writing down background information or describing the
methodology used to carry out a study it is simplest to include all the
details that you think are relevant – aiming for a summary rather than an epic.
Once completed I leave it and finish writing the essay – focusing on the
question and reaching a targeted conclusion (see future posts – there will
be one on conclusions). Having finished the essay I then go back to the
‘narrative section’ with a red pen and a critical eye. Then by crossing
out/deleting anything that was not referred back to elsewhere in the essay I
create a skeleton of sentences that are relevant. Finally I stitch these
sentences into a paragraph (or if there are not many left include them in
the introduction). This method worked for me - hopefully it will work for
you too.
Best
wishes, and if you keep getting work returned with comments about too much
description do not hesitate to contact me for help.